BP vs. NAK
BP (BP p.l.c.) and NAK (Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.) are both stocks. BP operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while NAK operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BP returned 9.35%/yr vs 20.01%/yr for NAK. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BP vs. NAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BP achieves a 26.20% return, which is significantly higher than NAK's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BP has underperformed NAK with an annualized return of 9.35%, while NAK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.01% annualized return.
BP
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 26.20%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 45.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
NAK
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- -5.12%
- 1Y
- 65.85%
- 3Y*
- 109.20%
- 5Y*
- 29.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.01%
BP vs. NAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BP BP p.l.c. | 26.20% | 24.54% | -11.84% | 6.00% | 37.01% | 36.38% | -41.31% | 5.83% | -4.57% | 20.02% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | 3.55% | 238.78% | 79.86% | 46.42% | -32.31% | 1.30% | -25.12% | -24.46% | -67.84% | -14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BP and NAK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2003 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BP and NAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BP:
$111.67B
NAK:
$1.12B
BP:
$1.23
NAK:
-CA$0.19
BP:
2.00
NAK:
88.47
BP:
$194.60B
NAK:
CA$0.00
BP:
$37.65B
NAK:
-CA$85.85K
BP:
$35.67B
NAK:
-CA$99.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BP vs. NAK — Risk / Return Rank
BP
NAK
BP vs. NAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. (BP) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 0.98 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 1.67 | +9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BP vs. NAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, smaller than the maximum NAK drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP and NAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -99.01% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -67.68% | +56.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.63% | -67.68% | +37.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.63% | -67.68% | +37.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.91% | -93.79% | +29.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.15% | -90.32% | +81.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -73.93% | +48.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 39.60% | -35.39% |
Volatility
BP vs. NAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BP p.l.c. (BP) is 8.25%, while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a volatility of 26.03%. This indicates that BP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 26.03% | -17.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 77.41% | -55.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.83% | 115.33% | -88.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.62% | 83.81% | -55.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 97.90% | -66.63% |
Dividends
BP vs. NAK - Dividend Comparison
BP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while NAK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BP BP p.l.c. | 4.67% | 5.64% | 6.20% | 4.71% | 3.94% | 4.83% | 9.21% | 6.52% | 6.41% | 5.66% | 6.37% | 7.63% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BP vs. NAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BP p.l.c. and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BP and NAK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAK has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to BP (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BP dropped -74.94% vs NAK's -99.01%.
BP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BP and NAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer