PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BP vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BP vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. (BP) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BP achieves a 33.40% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BP has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 9.10%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower -0.72% annualized return.


BP

1D
2.26%
1M
20.91%
6M
22.31%
YTD
33.40%
1Y
50.11%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
9.10%
ALL TIME*
5.63%

HAL

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.15%
6M
-2.91%
YTD
15.16%
1Y
52.77%
3Y*
-4.21%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
-0.72%
ALL TIME*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$336.64M$347.89M$371.76M
$496.27M$402.82M$436.82M

BP vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BP
BP p.l.c.
33.40%24.54%-11.84%6.00%37.01%36.38%-41.31%5.83%-4.57%20.02%
HAL
Halliburton Company
15.16%7.02%-23.19%-6.47%74.45%21.99%-21.23%-4.90%-44.63%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BP and HAL is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977

0.49

The correlation between BP and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BP:

$118.59B

HAL:

$26.94B

EPS

BP:

$1.23

HAL:

$1.90

PE Ratio

BP:

36.71

HAL:

16.95

PEG Ratio

BP:

3.59

HAL:

2.70

PS Ratio

BP:

0.60

HAL:

1.21

PB Ratio

BP:

2.11

HAL:

2.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

BP:

$194.60B

HAL:

$22.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BP:

$37.65B

HAL:

$3.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

BP:

$35.67B

HAL:

$3.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BP vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BP
BP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BP vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. (BP) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.75

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

5.65

+1.45

BP vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BP Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BP and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BP vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-92.99%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

-27.12%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-54.01%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-54.01%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.91%

-91.45%

+27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-45.34%

+41.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-39.13%

+13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

8.49%

-1.67%

Volatility

BP vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BP p.l.c. (BP) is 8.86%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that BP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

10.00%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

23.49%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.96%

35.71%

-7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.67%

39.87%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.28%

45.96%

-14.68%

Dividends

BP vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

BP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than HAL's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BP
BP p.l.c.
4.42%5.64%6.20%4.71%3.94%4.83%9.21%6.52%6.41%5.66%6.37%7.63%
HAL
Halliburton Company
2.11%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%

Financials

BP vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BP p.l.c. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BP vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BP p.l.c. and Halliburton Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BP p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 12.56B and revenue of 52.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 5.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.

BP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BP p.l.c. reported an operating income of 9.20B and revenue of 52.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 778.00M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

BP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BP p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.84B and revenue of 52.17B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BP and HAL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAL has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to BP (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BP dropped -74.94% vs HAL's -92.99%.

BP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BP and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer