PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXX vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -1.08% return.


BOXX

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.94%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
-6.70%
10Y*
-1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.60%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-1.08%4.25%-8.05%2.77%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXX and TLT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXXTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+12.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+36.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.69

1.07

+8.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

58.95

0.49

+58.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

524.63

1.19

+523.44

BOXX vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXX Sharpe Ratio is 12.68, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXX and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXXTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68

0.38

+12.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.89

0.25

+12.64

Drawdowns

BOXX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXXTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-48.35%

+48.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-7.58%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

-19.18%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-40.92%

+40.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-13.83%

+13.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

3.08%

-3.07%

Volatility

BOXX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.09%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXXTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

2.65%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

6.51%

-6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

9.60%

-9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

15.85%

-15.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

14.91%

-14.54%

BOXX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BOXX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.63%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXX and TLT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 3-year performance, BOXX leads with 4.72% vs -2.05% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOXX has performed better with a 4.72% return vs -2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TLT is Government Bonds. BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.15% for TLT.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.68 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXX and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer