BOXL vs. CISS
BOXL (Boxlight Corporation) and CISS (C3is Inc.) are both stocks. BOXL operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while CISS operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, BOXL returned -80.53%/yr vs -99.04%/yr for CISS. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BOXL vs. CISS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOXL achieves a -70.20% return, which is significantly higher than CISS's -99.63% return.
BOXL
- 1D
- 7.42%
- 1M
- -39.20%
- 6M
- -58.81%
- YTD
- -70.20%
- 1Y
- -95.70%
- 3Y*
- -80.53%
- 5Y*
- -74.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -61.97%
CISS
- 1D
- -12.50%
- 1M
- -93.35%
- 6M
- -99.07%
- YTD
- -99.63%
- 1Y
- -99.97%
- 3Y*
- -99.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -99.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $84.51K | $107.24K | $2.29M | |
CISS C3is Inc. | $9.53M | $4.63M | $3.51M |
BOXL vs. CISS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXL Boxlight Corporation | -70.20% | -85.15% | -64.34% | -43.68% |
CISS C3is Inc. | -99.63% | -97.31% | -98.92% | -84.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOXL and CISS is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
BOXL:
$482.28K
CISS:
$21.00K
BOXL:
-$82.58
CISS:
$2.63
BOXL:
0.01
CISS:
0.01
BOXL:
$82.61M
CISS:
$37.66M
BOXL:
$27.37M
CISS:
$8.58M
BOXL:
$3.81M
CISS:
$12.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOXL vs. CISS — Risk / Return Rank
BOXL
CISS
BOXL vs. CISS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and C3is Inc. (CISS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOXL | CISS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.53 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -1.00 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.22 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOXL vs. CISS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOXL drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CISS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXL and CISS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOXL | CISS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -100.00% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.41% | -99.98% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.35% | -100.00% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -100.00% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.69% | -96.70% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.99% | 82.02% | +0.97% |
Volatility
BOXL vs. CISS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) is 27.61%, while C3is Inc. (CISS) has a volatility of 186.50%. This indicates that BOXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOXL | CISS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.61% | 186.50% | -158.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.97% | 212.31% | -119.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 253.35% | 209.89% | +43.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 181.43% | 156.88% | +24.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.81% | 156.88% | +13.93% |
Dividends
BOXL vs. CISS - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOXL nor CISS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BOXL vs. CISS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boxlight Corporation and C3is Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BOXL and CISS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CISS has higher volatility (186.50%) compared to BOXL (27.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXL dropped -99.98% vs CISS's -100.00%.
BOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOXL and CISS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer