MLGO vs. ALZN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) and Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN).

Performance

MLGO vs. ALZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) and Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLGO vs. ALZN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc.	-9.50%	-96.08%	-97.94%	-27.04%	-87.60%	1.31%
ALZN Alzamend Neuro, Inc.	-43.96%	-82.57%	-86.97%	-89.50%	-70.27%	-85.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MLGO : $11.10M ALZN : $3.88M
EPS MLGO : $2.45 ALZN : -$2.82
PB Ratio MLGO : 0.03 ALZN : 1.78
Total Revenue (TTM) MLGO : $61.17M ALZN : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) MLGO : $16.42M ALZN : -$68.06K
EBITDA (TTM) MLGO : $3.58M ALZN : -$6.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLGO achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly higher than ALZN's -43.96% return.

MLGO

• 1D: 14.94%
• 1M: 13.96%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -58.81%
• 1Y: -99.41%
• 3Y*: -93.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALZN

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: -49.25%
• YTD: -43.96%
• 6M: -58.37%
• 1Y: -88.61%
• 3Y*: -87.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MLGO vs. ALZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLGO

MLGO Risk / Return Rank: 7
MLGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MLGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MLGO Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MLGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MLGO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ALZN

ALZN Risk / Return Rank: 6
ALZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ALZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ALZN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ALZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ALZN Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLGO vs. ALZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) and Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLGO	ALZN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	-0.82	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-3.57	-2.21	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.63	0.72	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	-0.99	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-1.25	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLGO vs. ALZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the ALZN Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLGO and ALZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLGO	ALZN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	-0.82	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	-0.67	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between MLGO and ALZN is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLGO vs. ALZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLGO nor ALZN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MLGO vs. ALZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLGO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ALZN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLGO and ALZN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLGO	ALZN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-99.99%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.50%	-89.10%	-10.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-99.99%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.87%	-94.48%	+32.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	94.68%	70.43%	+24.25%

Volatility

MLGO vs. ALZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) is 28.64%, while Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN) has a volatility of 46.76%. This indicates that MLGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLGO	ALZN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.64%	46.76%	-18.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.16%	64.57%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	157.90%	107.87%	+50.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	481.88%	129.68%	+352.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	481.88%	129.68%	+352.20%

Financials