MLGO vs. RLX
MLGO (MicroAlgo Inc.) and RLX (RLX Technology Inc.) are both stocks. MLGO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while RLX operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, MLGO returned -84.63%/yr vs -26.33%/yr for RLX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLGO vs. RLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLGO achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than RLX's -9.07% return.
MLGO
- 1D
- -14.98%
- 1M
- 28.39%
- YTD
- 15.61%
- 6M
- -20.40%
- 1Y
- -86.69%
- 3Y*
- -92.78%
- 5Y*
- -84.63%
- 10Y*
- —
RLX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 6M
- -11.35%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- -26.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MLGO vs. RLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc. | 15.61% | -96.08% | -97.94% | -27.04% | -87.60% | 3.70% |
RLX RLX Technology Inc. | -9.07% | 8.27% | 8.60% | -12.65% | -41.03% | -56.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLGO and RLX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
MLGO:
$2.45
RLX:
$0.76
MLGO:
2.09
RLX:
2.67
MLGO:
0.23
RLX:
0.60
MLGO:
$61.17M
RLX:
$4.35B
MLGO:
$16.42M
RLX:
$1.44B
MLGO:
$3.58M
RLX:
$513.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLGO vs. RLX — Risk / Return Rank
MLGO
RLX
MLGO vs. RLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) and RLX Technology Inc. (RLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLGO | RLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | 0.09 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | 0.38 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.04 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 0.11 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 0.23 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLGO | RLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 0.09 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.36 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -0.49 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
MLGO vs. RLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLGO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RLX drawdown of -96.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLGO and RLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLGO | RLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -96.80% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.65% | -24.02% | -67.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.99% | -32.89% | -67.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -90.47% | -9.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -92.72% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -88.72% | +25.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.06% | 12.06% | +67.00% |
Volatility
MLGO vs. RLX - Volatility Comparison
MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) has a higher volatility of 47.32% compared to RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) at 9.65%. This indicates that MLGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLGO | RLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.32% | 9.65% | +37.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.14% | 21.22% | +53.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 112.66% | 31.14% | +81.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 481.13% | 74.30% | +406.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 474.38% | 79.91% | +394.47% |
Dividends
MLGO vs. RLX - Dividend Comparison
MLGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLX RLX Technology Inc. | 5.42% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.50% |
Financials
MLGO vs. RLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MicroAlgo Inc. and RLX Technology Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MLGO and RLX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLGO has higher volatility (47.32%) compared to RLX (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLGO dropped -100.00% vs RLX's -96.80%.
RLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLGO and RLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer