BOUT vs. BBHM
BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BOUT tracks the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index while BBHM tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.
Performance
BOUT vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 31.88% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 3.11% return.
BOUT
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 31.88%
- 6M
- 28.55%
- 1Y
- 34.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOUT vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 31.88% | 0.17% |
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 3.11% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOUT and BBHM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOUT vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank
BOUT
BBHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOUT vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOUT | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOUT vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and BBHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOUT | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -9.78% | -27.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -4.05% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -2.97% | -9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility
BOUT vs. BBHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOUT | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 18.20% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 18.20% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 18.20% | +4.80% |
BOUT vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOUT vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison
BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOUT and BBHM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while BBHM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.81% for BBHM.
Find the right allocation for BOUT and BBHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer