PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -5.14% return.


BOTZ

1D
0.08%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
1.05%
6M
0.24%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and SMST is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.79

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

5.52

-2.75

BOTZ vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-99.25%

+43.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-85.39%

+66.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.06%

-96.27%

+84.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-90.74%

+72.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

43.15%

-37.05%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 9.78%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

46.13%

-36.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.00%

130.40%

-110.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.43%

146.32%

-120.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

167.25%

-140.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

167.25%

-141.43%

BOTZ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and SMST have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to BOTZ (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs 16.86% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer