PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. IROB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOTZ is traded in USD, while IROB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IROB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than IROB.DE's 28.63% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*

IROB.DE

1D
-0.54%
1M
10.95%
YTD
28.63%
6M
30.92%
1Y
59.88%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
28.63%24.45%-1.77%24.76%-33.93%16.24%44.49%30.93%-21.65%47.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and IROB.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.70

The correlation between BOTZ and IROB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IROB.DE
IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTZIROB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.77

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

14.55

-9.29

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and IROB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTZIROB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.64

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.31

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.55

-0.11

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than IROB.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and IROB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZIROB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-43.04%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-15.82%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-29.02%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-43.04%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-0.54%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-13.65%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

4.10%

+1.53%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) have volatilities of 7.77% and 7.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZIROB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

7.86%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

17.60%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

22.60%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

22.87%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

22.08%

+3.65%

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than IROB.DE's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. IROB.DE - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while IROB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and IROB.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IROB.DE.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while IROB.DE is Technology Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while IROB.DE tracks ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.80% for IROB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and IROB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer