PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.26% return.


BOTZ

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
5.91%
6M
7.16%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.04%
1M
-19.05%
YTD
-28.26%
6M
-28.63%
1Y
-39.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
5.91%14.17%12.62%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-28.26%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and IBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.86

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

-0.76

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

-1.31

+5.44

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-52.11%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-52.11%

+32.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-50.04%

+42.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-16.74%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

30.26%

-24.32%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 9.35%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

12.71%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.76%

34.47%

-14.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.23%

44.13%

-18.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

50.23%

-23.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

50.23%

-24.43%

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.62%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and IBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to BOTZ (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, BOTZ leads with 26.87% vs -39.29% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 26.87% return vs -39.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.25% for IBIT.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer