BOTZ vs. FBOT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. BOTZ is passively managed, while FBOT is actively managed. Over the past year, BOTZ returned 29.53% vs 39.88% for FBOT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FBOT.

Performance

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than FBOT's 20.06% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —

FBOT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 6M: 21.90%
• 1Y: 39.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	11.15%	14.17%	12.26%	-0.88%
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	20.06%	19.15%	12.58%	-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and FBOT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.91

The correlation between BOTZ and FBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTZ	FBOT
Industrials	48.6%	51.0%
Technology	31.8%	37.5%
Healthcare	9.0%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	6.3%
Communication Services	4.5%	4.2%
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. FBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTZ	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.98	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.70	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.64	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	10.50	-5.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the FBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and FBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTZ	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	1.98	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.81	-0.37

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than FBOT's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and FBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	FBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-23.61%	-31.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	-15.17%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-0.34%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.32%	-5.15%	-13.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	3.81%	+1.82%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) at 5.59%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	FBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	5.59%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.40%	16.00%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.98%	20.25%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.73%	20.95%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.73%	20.95%	+4.78%

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FBOT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. FBOT - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, which matches FBOT's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.59%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ and FBOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BOTZ and FBOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BOTZ or FBOT?

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to FBOT (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs FBOT's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ or FBOT?

On 1-year performance, FBOT leads with 39.88% vs 29.53% for BOTZ. On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FBOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTZ or FBOT?

Over the 1-year period, FBOT has performed better with a 39.88% return vs 29.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ or FBOT?

FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTZ or FBOT?

BOTZ and FBOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.59%.

What is the main difference between BOTZ and FBOT?

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while FBOT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.50% for FBOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.