PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-6.43%14.17%12.26%8.05%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
9.04%49.85%30.98%19.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 9.04% return.


BOTZ

1D
2.05%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

CHAT

1D
3.95%
1M
0.86%
YTD
9.04%
6M
5.64%
1Y
87.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOTZ vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTZCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

2.55

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

3.16

-1.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

5.51

-4.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.71

15.32

-11.61

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTZCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

2.55

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.33

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and CHAT is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than CHAT's 2.61% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.70%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.61%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and CHAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-31.34%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-16.28%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.52%

-3.05%

-11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-5.61%

-12.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

5.86%

-0.49%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 8.79%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOTZCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

13.18%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

23.54%

-5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

34.44%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

29.33%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.68%

29.33%

-3.65%