BOTZ vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L).

BOTZ and BOTG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. BOTG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. Both BOTZ and BOTG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-8.31%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	-6.38%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-10.03%	13.42%	13.06%	39.60%	-42.85%	-6.14%

Different Trading Currencies

BOTZ is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -10.03% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: -14.86%
• YTD: -8.31%
• 6M: -5.83%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 9.59%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

BOTG.L

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -16.51%
• YTD: -10.03%
• 6M: -6.59%
• 1Y: 15.96%
• 3Y*: 9.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

BOTG.L

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTZ	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	0.44	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	0.88	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.86	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	2.81	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and BOTG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTZ	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	0.44	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	-0.12	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and BOTG.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than BOTG.L's 0.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.71%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.27%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -53.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-43.70%	-11.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	-17.19%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.24%	-15.14%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-19.85%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	5.83%	-0.54%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) have volatilities of 8.91% and 8.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.91%	8.66%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.65%	16.89%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.77%	36.12%	-8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.53%	29.76%	-3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.68%	29.76%	-4.08%