PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. AKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than AKAM's 53.01% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.38%
1M
-10.83%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.47%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

AKAM

1D
0.79%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
53.01%
6M
55.45%
1Y
70.04%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
2.46%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
53.01%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and AKAM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.47

The correlation between BOTZ and AKAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. AKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZAKAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.77

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

9.09

-5.83

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the AKAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and AKAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum AKAM drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and AKAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZAKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-99.80%

+44.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-25.44%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-46.84%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-46.84%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-59.25%

+48.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-82.59%

+64.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

7.73%

-1.89%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 8.89%, while Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZAKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

15.13%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

47.95%

-28.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

54.31%

-29.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

36.61%

-9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

34.47%

-8.68%

Dividends

BOTZ vs. AKAM - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.64%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and AKAM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to BOTZ (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs AKAM's -99.80%.

AKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and AKAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer