PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTJ vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOTJ vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTJ achieves a 46.88% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -23.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BOTJ has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 11.09%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


BOTJ

1D
-2.06%
1M
5.54%
6M
44.39%
YTD
46.88%
1Y
101.69%
3Y*
39.79%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.81%

IBM

1D
0.86%
1M
-22.75%
6M
-26.12%
YTD
-23.51%
1Y
-8.27%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$696.17K$688.25K$558.52K
$2.40B$3.19B$2.85B

BOTJ vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
46.88%20.31%34.15%5.77%-21.22%42.81%-18.68%19.79%-11.49%-0.02%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-23.51%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTJ and IBM is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2000

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BOTJ:

$122.85M

IBM:

$210.71B

EPS

BOTJ:

$1.61

IBM:

$11.27

PE Ratio

BOTJ:

16.83

IBM:

19.84

PEG Ratio

BOTJ:

2.72

IBM:

0.24

PS Ratio

BOTJ:

1.64

IBM:

3.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOTJ:

$56.20M

IBM:

$69.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOTJ:

$24.76M

IBM:

$40.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOTJ:

$6.16M

IBM:

$14.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTJ vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOTJ
BOTJ Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BOTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOTJ vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTJIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.01

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.60

-0.25

+11.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.16

-0.59

+51.75

BOTJ vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.10, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTJ and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTJ vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTJ drawdown since its inception was -76.96%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTJ and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTJIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.96%

-69.40%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-37.50%

+28.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-37.50%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

-37.50%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

-40.59%

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-32.07%

+29.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.53%

-20.13%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

15.98%

-13.99%

Volatility

BOTJ vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) is 5.50%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 31.22%. This indicates that BOTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTJIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

31.22%

-25.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

46.22%

-27.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.95%

48.19%

-23.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.39%

30.02%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.80%

28.05%

+4.75%

Dividends

BOTJ vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

BOTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than IBM's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
1.48%2.15%2.52%2.62%2.43%1.73%2.31%1.83%1.85%1.61%1.58%1.70%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
3.01%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Financials

BOTJ vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BOTJ vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BOTJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.73M and revenue of 12.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -71.1%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.91B and revenue of 17.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

BOTJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00K and revenue of 12.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

BOTJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of -2.77M and revenue of 12.29M, resulting in a net margin of -22.6%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 2.17B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOTJ and IBM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (31.22%) compared to BOTJ (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTJ dropped -76.96% vs IBM's -69.40%.

BOTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTJ and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer