BOTJ vs. SLS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BOTJ (Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.) and SLS (SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.) are both stocks. BOTJ operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while SLS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, BOTJ returned 14.06%/yr vs 3.18%/yr for SLS. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BOTJ vs. SLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) and SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTJ achieves a 46.88% return, which is significantly lower than SLS's 165.52% return.

BOTJ

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 5.54%
• 6M: 44.39%
• YTD: 46.88%
• 1Y: 101.69%
• 3Y*: 39.79%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 11.09%
• ALL TIME*: 8.81%

SLS

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -33.18%
• 6M: 165.52%
• YTD: 165.52%
• 1Y: 503.01%
• 3Y*: 82.75%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOTJ Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.	$696.17K	$688.25K	$558.52K
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.	$71.84M	$99.94M	$98.11M

BOTJ vs. SLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOTJ Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.	46.88%	20.31%	34.15%	5.77%	-21.22%	42.81%	-18.68%	19.79%	-11.49%	-2.16%
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.	165.52%	262.50%	-1.89%	-55.08%	-57.32%	-4.82%	35.12%	-93.01%	-84.23%	-10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTJ and SLS is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOTJ : $122.85M SLS : $1.86B
EPS BOTJ : $1.61 SLS : -$0.20
Total Revenue (TTM) BOTJ : $56.20M SLS : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) BOTJ : $24.76M SLS : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) BOTJ : $6.16M SLS : -$23.82M

Return for Risk

BOTJ vs. SLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOTJ

BOTJ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BOTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BOTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BOTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BOTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BOTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

SLS

SLS Risk / Return Rank: 98
SLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SLS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SLS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOTJ vs. SLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) and SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTJ	SLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.10	5.22	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.32	4.10	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.47	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.60	14.74	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	51.16	31.81	+19.35

BOTJ vs. SLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.10, which is comparable to the SLS Sharpe Ratio of 5.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTJ and SLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTJ vs. SLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTJ drawdown since its inception was -76.96%, smaller than the maximum SLS drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTJ and SLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTJ	SLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.96%	-99.89%	+22.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-36.24%	+27.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.84%	-72.20%	+44.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.68%	-95.19%	+49.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-97.77%	+95.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-93.97%	+67.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	16.76%	-14.77%

Volatility

BOTJ vs. SLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) is 5.50%, while SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS) has a volatility of 27.48%. This indicates that BOTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTJ	SLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	27.48%	-21.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	76.14%	-57.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.95%	102.49%	-77.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.39%	96.45%	-64.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.80%	133.75%	-100.95%

Dividends

BOTJ vs. SLS - Dividend Comparison

BOTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while SLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTJ Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.	1.48%	2.15%	2.52%	2.62%	2.43%	1.73%	2.31%	1.83%	1.85%	1.61%	1.58%	1.70%
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTJ and SLS in my portfolio?

BOTJ and SLS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTJ or SLS?

SLS has higher volatility (27.48%) compared to BOTJ (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTJ dropped -76.96% vs SLS's -99.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.22 vs 4.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.