BOTJ vs. SLS
BOTJ (Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.) and SLS (SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.) are both stocks. BOTJ operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while SLS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, BOTJ returned 13.03%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for SLS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOTJ vs. SLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTJ achieves a 41.83% return, which is significantly lower than SLS's 234.75% return.
BOTJ
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 45.59%
- YTD
- 41.83%
- 1Y
- 89.91%
- 3Y*
- 44.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
SLS
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 61.17%
- 6M
- 207.06%
- YTD
- 234.75%
- 1Y
- 585.87%
- 3Y*
- 94.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTJ vs. SLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTJ Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. | 41.83% | 20.31% | 34.15% | 5.77% | -21.22% | 42.81% | -18.68% | 19.79% | -11.49% | -2.16% |
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. | 234.75% | 262.50% | -1.89% | -55.08% | -57.32% | -4.82% | 35.12% | -93.01% | -84.23% | -10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTJ and SLS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
BOTJ:
$118.63M
SLS:
$2.35B
BOTJ:
$2.41
SLS:
-$0.20
BOTJ:
1.46
SLS:
20.27
BOTJ:
$47.51M
SLS:
$0.00
BOTJ:
$37.35M
SLS:
$0.00
BOTJ:
$10.97M
SLS:
-$23.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTJ vs. SLS — Risk / Return Rank
BOTJ
SLS
BOTJ vs. SLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) and SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTJ | SLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.51 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.25 | 16.31 | -6.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.26 | 35.63 | +5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTJ vs. SLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTJ drawdown since its inception was -76.96%, smaller than the maximum SLS drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTJ and SLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTJ | SLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.96% | -99.89% | +22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -36.24% | +27.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -72.20% | +44.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.25% | -95.19% | +48.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -97.19% | +97.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -93.94% | +67.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 16.56% | -14.37% |
Volatility
BOTJ vs. SLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) is 5.47%, while SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS) has a volatility of 37.55%. This indicates that BOTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTJ | SLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 37.55% | -32.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 77.35% | -59.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.95% | 100.96% | -76.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 96.13% | -63.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 133.97% | -101.15% |
Dividends
BOTJ vs. SLS - Dividend Comparison
BOTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while SLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTJ Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. | 1.53% | 2.15% | 2.52% | 2.62% | 2.43% | 1.73% | 2.31% | 1.83% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.70% |
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BOTJ vs. SLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BOTJ and SLS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLS has higher volatility (37.55%) compared to BOTJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTJ dropped -76.96% vs SLS's -99.89%.
SLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.87 vs 3.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOTJ and SLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer