PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOLD.DE is traded in USD, while ESGP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ESGP.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOLD.DE achieves a -9.52% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.DE's 8.78% return.


BOLD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.45%
6M
-15.93%
YTD
-9.52%
1Y
-2.01%
3Y*
27.44%
5Y*
10Y*

ESGP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.25%
6M
6.95%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
14.87%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BOLD.DE
21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP
-9.52%25.46%57.68%33.01%-10.53%
ESGP.DE
Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF
8.78%19.43%6.48%5.33%-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2022

0.27

The correlation between BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOLD.DE
BOLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BOLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BOLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGP.DE
ESGP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOLD.DEESGP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.71

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.21

4.54

-4.74

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, roughly equal to the maximum ESGP.DE drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOLD.DEESGP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-23.66%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.33%

-8.74%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-19.16%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.24%

-1.41%

-17.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-6.95%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.68%

3.29%

+6.39%

Volatility

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison

21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 2.73%. This indicates that BOLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOLD.DEESGP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

2.73%

+4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.01%

11.00%

+9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

13.58%

+10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

16.80%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

16.80%

+1.59%

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOLD.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOLD.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOLD.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGP.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGP.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BOLD.DE.

BOLD.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ESGP.DE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BOLD.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOLD.DE and ESGP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer