BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L).

BOLD.DE and GLDI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOLD.DE is an actively managed fund by 21Shares. It was launched on Apr 26, 2022. GLDI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 22, 2024.

Performance

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOLD.DE 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP	-2.62%	25.46%	22.26%
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP	2.69%	61.04%	6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOLD.DE achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI.L's 2.69% return.

BOLD.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -3.77%
• YTD: -2.62%
• 6M: -1.88%
• 1Y: 13.96%
• 3Y*: 29.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDI.L

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -9.91%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 6M: 13.27%
• 1Y: 37.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOLD.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

BOLD.DE

21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP

GLDI.L

IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP

Return for Risk

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOLD.DE

BOLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BOLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BOLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BOLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BOLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GLDI.L

GLDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GLDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GLDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GLDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GLDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOLD.DE	GLDI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.71	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	2.09	-1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.32	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	2.27	-1.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.33	8.90	-6.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOLD.DE and GLDI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOLD.DE	GLDI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	1.71	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	2.09	-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between BOLD.DE and GLDI.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Dividend Comparison

BOLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024
BOLD.DE 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP	11.85%	9.15%	1.08%

Drawdowns

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, smaller than the maximum GLDI.L drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOLD.DE and GLDI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOLD.DE	GLDI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.69%	-16.47%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.69%	-16.47%	+1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.07%	-12.11%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-2.52%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	4.21%	+1.47%

Volatility

BOLD.DE vs. GLDI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 21Shares Bitcoin Gold ETP (BOLD.DE) is 9.30%, while IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that BOLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOLD.DE	GLDI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.30%	10.65%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	19.26%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.68%	22.08%	-0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	18.84%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	18.84%	-1.03%