PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. RDVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOIL vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -55.20% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 16.92% return.


BOIL

1D
1.23%
1M
-22.39%
6M
-74.77%
YTD
-55.20%
1Y
-71.40%
3Y*
-67.40%
5Y*
-69.84%
10Y*
-58.99%
ALL TIME*
-57.95%

RDVI

1D
0.17%
1M
1.16%
6M
12.27%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.80M$100.03M$104.47M
$26.93M$24.23M$18.87M

BOIL vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-55.20%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-52.84%
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
16.92%17.93%14.56%18.63%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and RDVI is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.04

The correlation between BOIL and RDVI shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOIL vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVI
RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOIL vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOILRDVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.36

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.38

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

14.18

-15.58

BOIL vs. RDVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the RDVI Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and RDVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than RDVI's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and RDVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOILRDVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-18.35%

-81.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.68%

-8.48%

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.48%

-18.35%

-79.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

0.00%

-100.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.63%

-3.07%

-90.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.79%

2.02%

+48.77%

Volatility

BOIL vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) at 3.43%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOILRDVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.90%

3.43%

+15.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.55%

10.96%

+80.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.59%

13.99%

+96.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.92%

16.83%

+102.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.64%

16.83%

+84.81%

BOIL vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOIL vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
7.74%8.10%8.62%8.45%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOIL and RDVI have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (18.90%) compared to RDVI (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs RDVI's -18.35%.

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.44% vs -67.40% for BOIL. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RDVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.44% return vs -67.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.

BOIL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while RDVI is Derivative Income. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.75% for RDVI.

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and RDVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer