PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOGSX vs. FDTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a 43.19% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's 12.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BOGSX having a 17.86% annualized return and FDTRX not far ahead at 18.67%.


BOGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
13.74%
YTD
43.19%
6M
42.16%
1Y
62.18%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
17.86%

FDTRX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.69%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.72%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
18.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
43.19%19.06%9.25%17.79%-27.30%26.89%45.16%38.20%-4.94%19.05%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
12.36%18.97%31.01%44.92%-40.07%12.90%58.22%36.84%3.22%39.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BOGSX and FDTRX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.86

The correlation between BOGSX and FDTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOGSX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOGSX
BOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTRX
FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOGSXFDTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.68

1.46

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.50

4.56

+14.94

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the FDTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOGSX and FDTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOGSXFDTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

1.46

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.43

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.76

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.75

-0.64

Drawdowns

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than FDTRX's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and FDTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOGSXFDTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.80%

-48.10%

-44.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-20.39%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-26.19%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-48.10%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-48.10%

+14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.95%

-9.14%

-49.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

6.52%

-3.31%

Volatility

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) at 4.99%. This indicates that BOGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOGSXFDTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

4.99%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

15.86%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.46%

20.41%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.21%

26.21%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

24.61%

-0.01%

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOGSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOGSX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison

BOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than FDTRX's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
4.02%5.76%7.96%3.79%1.87%11.31%6.30%5.47%11.71%7.71%4.00%3.09%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
9.24%10.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%0.00%0.71%2.80%1.71%3.44%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOGSX and FDTRX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOGSX has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to FDTRX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOGSX dropped -92.80% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.

BOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOGSX and FDTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer