BOCT vs. BOUT
BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) and BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BOUT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOCT returned 10.56%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for BOUT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BOUT.
Performance
BOCT vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.39% return.
BOCT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- —
BOUT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 31.39%
- 6M
- 30.30%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BOCT vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 7.17% | 14.34% | 12.36% | 21.13% | -8.14% | 14.97% | 14.69% | 19.05% | -10.25% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 31.39% | -6.77% | 18.82% | 13.27% | -22.60% | 22.69% | 50.56% | 20.59% | -28.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOCT and BOUT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BOCT and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOCT vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOCT
BOUT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BOCT
BOUT
Financial Services
BOCT
BOUT
Communication Services
BOCT
BOUT
Consumer Cyclical
BOCT
BOUT
Healthcare
BOCT
BOUT
Industrials
BOCT
BOUT
Consumer Defensive
BOCT
BOUT
Energy
BOCT
BOUT
Utilities
BOCT
BOUT
Real Estate
BOCT
BOUT
Basic Materials
BOCT
BOUT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOCT vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank
BOCT
BOUT
BOCT vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOCT | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 1.71 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 2.33 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.01 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 9.00 | +7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOCT | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.71 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.43 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.41 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
BOCT vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BOUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOCT | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -36.75% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.09% | -11.76% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.61% | -25.31% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -28.28% | +13.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.01% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -12.29% | +9.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 3.93% | -2.67% |
Volatility
BOCT vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 1.33%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOCT | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 5.96% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.11% | 16.05% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 20.79% | -12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 19.48% | -8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 22.93% | -9.11% |
BOCT vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOCT vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison
BOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOCT and BOUT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOUT has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to BOCT (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs BOUT's -36.75%.
On 5-year performance, BOCT leads with 10.56% vs 8.25% for BOUT. On fees, BOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.
BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for BOCT.
BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.80% for BOUT.
BOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOCT and BOUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer