BOCT vs. BALT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BOCT tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index while BALT tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOCT returned 14.58%/yr vs 7.27%/yr for BALT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.

Performance

BOCT vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 1.91% return.

BOCT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 14.58%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: —

BALT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	7.17%	14.34%	12.36%	21.13%	-8.14%	7.06%
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	1.91%	6.65%	9.98%	7.45%	2.54%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and BALT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.76

The correlation between BOCT and BALT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOCT vs. BALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOCT	BALT
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BOCT vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT

BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 77
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BALT

BALT Risk / Return Rank: 92
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOCT	BALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	3.19	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	4.88	-1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.67	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	6.05	-2.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	22.58	-6.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOCT vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and BALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOCT	BALT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	3.19	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.80	-1.03

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOCT	BALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-4.89%	-19.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.09%	-1.15%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.61%	-4.89%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.06%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-0.34%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	0.31%	+0.95%

Volatility

BOCT vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.37%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOCT	BALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	0.37%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.11%	1.56%	+4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.18%	2.19%	+5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.09%	3.32%	+7.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	3.32%	+10.50%

BOCT vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOCT vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOCT and BALT in my portfolio?

BOCT and BALT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOCT or BALT?

BOCT has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to BALT (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs BALT's -4.89%.

Which ETF is better, BOCT or BALT?

On 3-year performance, BOCT leads with 14.58% vs 7.27% for BALT. On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOCT or BALT?

Over the 3-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOCT or BALT?

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOCT or BALT?

BOCT and BALT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BOCT and BALT?

BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BALT tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.69% for BALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.