PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOCT vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOCT vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
-2.30%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%7.06%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.00%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%

Returns By Period


BOCT

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOCT vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCTBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.51

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

2.32

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.95

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.40

12.95

-4.55

BOCT vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCTBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.51

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.71

-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and BALT is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BOCT vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-4.89%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-3.48%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.65%

-0.92%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-0.35%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

0.52%

+1.25%

Volatility

BOCT vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.62%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOCTBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

0.62%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

1.84%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

4.48%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

3.36%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

3.36%

+10.58%