PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOBP vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOBP vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BOBP

1D
-1.75%
1M
-4.01%
6M
13.03%
YTD
18.56%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOBP vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BOBP
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF
18.56%6.14%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and SPXM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOBP vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOBP vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOBPSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.10

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

9.84

-2.06

BOBP vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOBP and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOBPSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-5.08%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-5.08%

-7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.22%

-0.75%

-8.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.78%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

BOBP vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that BOBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOBPSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.53%

0.00%

+12.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.80%

3.99%

+16.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.81%

7.68%

+15.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

7.64%

+13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

7.64%

+13.92%

BOBP vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOBP vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BOBP
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF
2.79%3.31%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOBP and SPXM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOBP has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -13.06% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 26.28% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 26.28% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

BOBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 0.47% for SPXM.

SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOBP and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer