BNY vs. GRMN
BNY (The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation) and GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) are both stocks. BNY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BNY returned 17.86%/yr vs 21.30%/yr for GRMN. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNY vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNY achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than GRMN's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BNY has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 17.86%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.30% annualized return.
BNY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 30.43%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 1Y
- 61.76%
- 3Y*
- 55.66%
- 5Y*
- 29.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
GRMN
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 21.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
BNY vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNY The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 36.32% | 54.45% | 51.90% | 18.52% | -19.14% | 40.55% | -12.91% | 9.56% | -10.85% | 15.68% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 21.67% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNY and GRMN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.38 |
The correlation between BNY and GRMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BNY:
$107.71B
GRMN:
$47.20B
BNY:
$8.98
GRMN:
$8.97
BNY:
17.48
GRMN:
27.30
BNY:
0.86
GRMN:
2.19
BNY:
3.06
GRMN:
6.35
BNY:
$35.99B
GRMN:
$7.46B
BNY:
$21.25B
GRMN:
$4.41B
BNY:
$9.39B
GRMN:
$2.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNY vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank
BNY
GRMN
BNY vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNY | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.08 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 0.33 | +5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 0.70 | +16.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNY vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNY drawdown since its inception was -72.28%, smaller than the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNY and GRMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNY | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.28% | -87.71% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -27.97% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -27.97% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.45% | -54.63% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.49% | -54.63% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -8.09% | +4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -31.46% | +12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 13.14% | -9.54% |
Volatility
BNY vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 6.66%. This indicates that BNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNY | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 6.66% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | 22.57% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 30.36% | -9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 30.53% | -6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 28.32% | -1.43% |
Dividends
BNY vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison
BNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than GRMN's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNY The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 1.35% | 1.72% | 2.32% | 3.04% | 3.12% | 2.24% | 2.92% | 2.34% | 2.21% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.65% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
Financials
BNY vs. GRMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BNY vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison
BNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 5.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
BNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported an operating income of 2.27B and revenue of 5.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.8%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
BNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported a net income of 1.76B and revenue of 5.70B, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNY and GRMN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNY has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to GRMN (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNY dropped -72.28% vs GRMN's -87.71%.
BNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNY and GRMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer