BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L
BNXG.DE (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) and ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - BNXG.DE tracks the CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity while ESGB.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNXG.DE returned 12.34%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for ESGB.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNXG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESGB.L.
Performance
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BNXG.DE is traded in EUR, while ESGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNXG.DE achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than ESGB.L's -12.86% return.
BNXG.DE
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 54.31%
- 3Y*
- 42.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -12.86%
- 6M
- -16.60%
- 1Y
- -13.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNXG.DE Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 25.60% | 30.08% | 24.44% | 61.89% | -49.28% | 37.62% | 73.64% | 11.76% |
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -12.86% | 12.43% | 58.35% | 28.59% | -30.88% | 5.05% | 71.02% | 17.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNXG.DE and ESGB.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between BNXG.DE and ESGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
BNXG.DE
ESGB.L
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNXG.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.88 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.52 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | -0.92 | +4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNXG.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | -0.80 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.71 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than ESGB.L's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNXG.DE and ESGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNXG.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -40.14% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.72% | -26.21% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.54% | -26.21% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.23% | -40.14% | -17.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -24.73% | +19.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -12.69% | -8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.69% | 14.93% | -0.24% |
Volatility
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) at 4.11%. This indicates that BNXG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNXG.DE | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | 4.11% | +5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.00% | 13.09% | +11.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 17.30% | +22.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 22.51% | +13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 23.36% | +12.01% |
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNXG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGB.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNXG.DE vs. ESGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNXG.DE nor ESGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNXG.DE and ESGB.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGB.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGB.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.
BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while ESGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BNXG.DE and 0.55% for ESGB.L.
Find the right allocation for BNXG.DE and ESGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer