BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO
BNS.TO (The Bank of Nova Scotia) is a stock, while QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past year, BNS.TO returned 59.91% vs 43.99% for QQCL.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNS.TO achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 20.85% return.
BNS.TO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 59.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
QQCL.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 6M
- 17.94%
- 1Y
- 43.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | 12.50% | 38.75% | 27.51% | 6.56% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 20.85% | 13.10% | 41.38% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNS.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BNS.TO
QQCL.TO
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNS.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 1.51 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | 4.14 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.36 | 15.49 | +4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNS.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03 | 2.81 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.52 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than QQCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS.TO and QQCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNS.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -25.63% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -10.68% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -3.32% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.85% | +0.10% |
Volatility
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) at 4.30%. This indicates that BNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNS.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.30% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 12.58% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 15.74% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 20.38% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 20.38% | -1.58% |
Dividends
BNS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
BNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than QQCL.TO's 13.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.95% | 4.27% | 5.49% | 6.48% | 4.61% | 5.14% | 5.23% | 3.60% | 4.91% | 3.82% | 3.91% | 6.11% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 13.15% | 14.54% | 11.87% | 3.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNS.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BNS.TO and QQCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer