PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BNS.TOMFC.TO
YTD Return21.86%44.77%
1Y Return32.83%68.05%
3Y Return (Ann)2.15%24.32%
5Y Return (Ann)5.21%15.04%
10Y Return (Ann)6.18%10.94%
Sharpe Ratio2.153.77
Sortino Ratio2.905.39
Omega Ratio1.381.74
Calmar Ratio1.040.70
Martin Ratio7.7827.28
Ulcer Index4.30%2.57%
Daily Std Dev15.57%18.61%
Max Drawdown-52.27%-100.00%
Current Drawdown-7.57%-99.99%

Fundamentals


BNS.TOMFC.TO
Market CapCA$91.24BCA$72.68B
EPSCA$5.81CA$2.36
PE Ratio12.6917.51
PEG Ratio1.350.91
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$35.40BCA$30.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$35.40BCA$30.97B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$6.32BCA$125.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between BNS.TO and MFC.TO is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BNS.TO achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly lower than MFC.TO's 44.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BNS.TO has underperformed MFC.TO with an annualized return of 6.18%, while MFC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.42%
0
BNS.TO
MFC.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNS.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BNS.TO, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BNS.TO, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BNS.TO, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BNS.TO, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BNS.TO, currently valued at 6.30, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.30
MFC.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 3.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 4.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 21.79, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0021.79

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNS.TO and MFC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.81
3.29
BNS.TO
MFC.TO

Dividends

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than MFC.TO's 2.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BNS.TO
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.75%6.48%4.61%5.14%5.23%3.60%4.91%3.82%3.91%6.11%3.86%2.74%
MFC.TO
Manulife Financial Corporation
2.78%3.67%4.21%3.88%4.93%2.86%3.64%2.60%2.36%3.28%3.12%2.39%

Drawdowns

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, smaller than the maximum MFC.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS.TO and MFC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-15.75%
-99.99%
BNS.TO
MFC.TO

Volatility

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) is 4.33%, while Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that BNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.33%
4.81%
BNS.TO
MFC.TO

Financials

BNS.TO vs. MFC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of Nova Scotia and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items