BNKU vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 92.66% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BNKU vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

BNKU

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 12.81%
• 6M: 18.36%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 1Y: 92.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	29.57%	34.97%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and SBIT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 54
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKU	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.41	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.05	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.60	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	5.92	+0.06

BNKU vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -61.21%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.21%	-91.35%	+30.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-47.94%	+6.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-77.15%	+75.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-68.83%	+51.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.55%	21.04%	-5.49%

Volatility

BNKU vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is 17.34%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.34%	22.98%	-5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.43%	68.89%	-22.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.62%	88.51%	-29.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.40%	96.89%	-24.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.40%	96.89%	-24.49%

BNKU vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BNKU and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BNKU vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and SBIT in my portfolio?

BNKU and SBIT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to BNKU (17.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -61.21% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 92.66% for BNKU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 17.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 92.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or SBIT?

BNKU and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between BNKU and SBIT?

BNKU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.