BNKD vs. VMAX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while VMAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Hartford. BNKD is passively managed, while VMAX is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -68.88% vs 29.83% for VMAX. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.

Performance

BNKD vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -37.77% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 15.89% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -23.52%
• YTD: -37.77%
• 6M: -33.35%
• 1Y: -68.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VMAX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 29.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-37.77%	-59.47%
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF	15.89%	7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and VMAX is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.79

The correlation between BNKD and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BNKD vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKD	VMAX
Financial Services	100.0%	32.4%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Communication Services	-	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	11.0%
Healthcare	-	11.1%
Industrials	-	5.5%
Real Estate	-	4.4%
Technology	-	13.3%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VMAX

VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKD	VMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.19	2.44	-3.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.34	3.32	-5.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.43	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	6.08	-7.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	21.32	-22.98

BNKD vs. VMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the VMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and VMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, which is greater than VMAX's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and VMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	VMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.96%	-19.05%	-68.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.06%	-4.93%	-63.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.77%	0.00%	-87.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.83%	-2.52%	-62.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.72%	1.40%	+42.32%

Volatility

BNKD vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.41% compared to Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) at 3.22%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	VMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.41%	3.22%	+14.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.55%	8.83%	+37.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.11%	12.29%	+45.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.83%	15.39%	+58.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.83%	15.39%	+58.44%

BNKD vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKD vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison

BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF	1.86%	2.14%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and VMAX in my portfolio?

BNKD and VMAX have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or VMAX?

BNKD has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to VMAX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -87.96% vs VMAX's -19.05%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or VMAX?

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.83% vs -68.88% for BNKD. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or VMAX?

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.83% return vs -68.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or VMAX?

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or VMAX?

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.

What is the main difference between BNKD and VMAX?

BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VMAX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.29% for VMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.