BNKD vs. NVDX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while NVDX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. BNKD is passively managed, while NVDX is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.49% vs 3.40% for NVDX. Their -0.37 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDX.

Performance

BNKD vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -47.45% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 8.06% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -14.63%
• 6M: -40.41%
• YTD: -47.45%
• 1Y: -69.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -65.56%

NVDX

• 1D: 4.93%
• 1M: 15.41%
• 6M: 17.83%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 3.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 114.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$13.59K	$10.52K	$9.72K
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	$110.76M	$116.26M	$171.62M

BNKD vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-47.45%	-59.47%
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	8.06%	29.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and NVDX is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.37

The correlation between BNKD and NVDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (all time) to -0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNKD vs. NVDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKD	NVDX
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NVDX

NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 13
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNKD vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKD	NVDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	0.05	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.31	0.59	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.07	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	0.08	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	0.15	-1.74

BNKD vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the NVDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and NVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -89.67%, which is greater than NVDX's maximum drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and NVDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	NVDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.67%	-68.19%	-21.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.39%	-43.76%	-26.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.67%	-24.74%	-64.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.59%	-20.75%	-45.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.77%	22.58%	+21.19%

Volatility

BNKD vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) is 16.93%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 24.90%. This indicates that BNKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	NVDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.93%	24.90%	-7.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.31%	56.77%	-9.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.67%	73.00%	-13.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.91%	94.80%	-21.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.91%	94.80%	-21.89%

BNKD vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKD vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	3.10%	3.35%	15.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and NVDX in my portfolio?

BNKD and NVDX have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or NVDX?

NVDX has higher volatility (24.90%) compared to BNKD (16.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -89.67% vs NVDX's -68.19%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or NVDX?

On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 3.40% vs -69.49% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 16.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or NVDX?

Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 3.40% return vs -69.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or NVDX?

BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or NVDX?

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.

What is the main difference between BNKD and NVDX?

BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 1.05% for NVDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.