BNKD vs. MAVF

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and MAVF (Matrix Advisors Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while MAVF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Matrix. BNKD is passively managed, while MAVF is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.49% vs 29.91% for MAVF. Their -0.77 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MAVF.

Performance

BNKD vs. MAVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -47.45% return, which is significantly lower than MAVF's 17.00% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -14.63%
• 6M: -40.41%
• YTD: -47.45%
• 1Y: -69.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -65.56%

MAVF

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 4.35%
• 6M: 11.71%
• YTD: 17.00%
• 1Y: 29.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$13.59K	$10.52K	$9.72K
MAVF Matrix Advisors Value ETF	$42.88K	$48.25K	$54.16K

BNKD vs. MAVF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-47.45%	-64.04%
MAVF Matrix Advisors Value ETF	17.00%	18.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and MAVF is -0.70, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025	-0.77

The correlation between BNKD and MAVF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

BNKD vs. MAVF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKD	MAVF
Financial Services	100.0%	25.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	15.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	9.3%
Industrials	-	5.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	26.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. MAVF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MAVF

MAVF Risk / Return Rank: 75
MAVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MAVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MAVF Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MAVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAVF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNKD vs. MAVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKD	MAVF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	2.04	-3.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.31	2.82	-5.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.35	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.75	-3.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	10.87	-12.46

BNKD vs. MAVF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the MAVF Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and MAVF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. MAVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -89.67%, which is greater than MAVF's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and MAVF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	MAVF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.67%	-17.13%	-72.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.39%	-10.94%	-59.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.67%	0.00%	-89.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.59%	-2.46%	-64.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.77%	2.76%	+41.01%

Volatility

BNKD vs. MAVF - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 16.93% compared to Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) at 4.73%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	MAVF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.93%	4.73%	+12.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.31%	11.69%	+35.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.67%	14.78%	+44.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.91%	18.86%	+54.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.91%	18.86%	+54.05%

BNKD vs. MAVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAVF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKD vs. MAVF - Dividend Comparison

BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
MAVF Matrix Advisors Value ETF	0.36%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and MAVF in my portfolio?

BNKD and MAVF have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or MAVF?

BNKD has higher volatility (16.93%) compared to MAVF (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -89.67% vs MAVF's -17.13%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or MAVF?

On 1-year performance, MAVF leads with 29.91% vs -69.49% for BNKD. On fees, MAVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MAVF has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or MAVF?

Over the 1-year period, MAVF has performed better with a 29.91% return vs -69.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or MAVF?

MAVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or MAVF?

MAVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.

What is the main difference between BNKD and MAVF?

BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MAVF is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Matrix. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.75% for MAVF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.