PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKD vs. BRKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKD vs. BRKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than BRKD's 5.90% return.


BNKD

1D
-10.32%
1M
-15.34%
YTD
-28.25%
6M
-36.58%
1Y
-69.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRKD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.90%
6M
6.21%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. BRKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and BRKD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKD vs. BRKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD
BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKD
BRKD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BRKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. BRKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKDBRKDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.10

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.67

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

1.31

-2.72

BNKD vs. BRKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the BRKD Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and BRKD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKDBRKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.20

0.48

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

0.04

-0.90

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. BRKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than BRKD's maximum drawdown of -17.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and BRKD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKDBRKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.90%

-17.92%

-67.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.14%

-9.34%

-60.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.90%

-3.69%

-82.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.08%

-7.73%

-56.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.49%

4.78%

+44.71%

Volatility

BNKD vs. BRKD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) at 0.00%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKDBRKDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.80%

0.00%

+17.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.63%

9.20%

+37.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.20%

13.32%

+44.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.59%

17.23%

+57.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.59%

17.23%

+57.36%

BNKD vs. BRKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKD vs. BRKD - Dividend Comparison

BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BNKD and BRKD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNKD has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to BRKD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -85.90% vs BRKD's -17.92%.

On 1-year performance, BRKD leads with 6.26% vs -69.69% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BRKD has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRKD has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BRKD.

BRKD has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.

BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while BRKD tracks Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 1.00% for BRKD.

BRKD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKD and BRKD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer