PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 1.72%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.72%

XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.02%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and XLE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

-0.15

The correlation between BNDX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNDX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BNDX
XLE

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Financial Services

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Industrials

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Energy

BNDX
0.0%
XLE
100.0%

Communication Services

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Utilities

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Healthcare

BNDX
0.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

BNDX

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

BNDX

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

BNDX

-

XLE

-

Technology

BNDX

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

3.10

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

8.63

-6.79

BNDX vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-71.26%

+55.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-12.05%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-20.14%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-26.04%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-66.81%

+50.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-8.01%

+6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-17.97%

+14.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

4.32%

-3.27%

Volatility

BNDX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.49%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

7.26%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

16.79%

-13.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

20.57%

-17.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

26.05%

-21.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

29.58%

-25.48%

BNDX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and XLE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to BNDX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.91% vs 1.72% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer