PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed VBK with an annualized return of 1.65%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.55%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.65%

VBK

1D
0.58%
1M
0.15%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDX vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.37%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.03%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and VBK is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.04

Over the past year, BNDX and VBK have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

BNDX vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BNDX
VBK

Real Estate

0.0%
3.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
5.6%

Industrials

0.0%
24.7%

Energy

0.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

0.0%
3.5%

Utilities

0.0%
1.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
15.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Technology

-

25.9%

Real Estate

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
3.9%

Financial Services

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
5.6%

Industrials

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
24.7%

Energy

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
4.8%

Communication Services

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
3.5%

Utilities

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
1.2%

Healthcare

BNDX
0.0%
VBK
15.3%

Basic Materials

BNDX

-

VBK
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BNDX

-

VBK
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

BNDX

-

VBK
2.4%

Technology

BNDX

-

VBK
25.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDX vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDXVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.40

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

9.10

-7.30

BNDX vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDXVBKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.40

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.20

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.50

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-58.68%

+42.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-11.44%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-27.54%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-38.39%

+22.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-38.70%

+22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-3.91%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-10.15%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

3.02%

-1.98%

Volatility

BNDX vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.47%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

6.43%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

15.18%

-12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

19.65%

-16.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

23.54%

-18.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

22.90%

-18.81%

BNDX vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDX vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than VBK's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.50%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.46%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and VBK have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to BNDX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.47% vs 1.65% for BNDX. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BNDX.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.46% for VBK.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.05% for VBK.

VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer