BNDX vs. IBND
BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) and IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDX is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while IBND is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BNDX returned 1.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for IBND. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBND.
Performance
BNDX vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has outperformed IBND with an annualized return of 1.69%, while IBND has yielded a comparatively lower 0.79% annualized return.
BNDX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
IBND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -1.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- -1.34%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
BNDX vs. IBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 1.50% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.40% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | -2.31% | 16.17% | -2.81% | 10.38% | -19.44% | -8.40% | 11.50% | 4.41% | -6.15% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDX and IBND is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, BNDX and IBND have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDX vs. IBND — Risk / Return Rank
BNDX
IBND
BNDX vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDX | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.15 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | -0.39 | +2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDX vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and IBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDX | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -35.62% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -6.75% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.93% | -9.18% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | -33.49% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.23% | -35.62% | +19.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -10.57% | +10.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -10.63% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.68% | -1.62% |
Volatility
BNDX vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 0.93%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDX | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 1.99% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 6.25% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 7.95% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 9.75% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 8.92% | -4.83% |
BNDX vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDX vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than IBND's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.49% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDX and IBND have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBND has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to BNDX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs IBND's -35.62%.
On 10-year performance, BNDX leads with 1.69% vs 0.79% for IBND. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BNDX has performed better with a 1.69% return vs 0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.
BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.77% for IBND.
BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while IBND is Corporate Bonds. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.50% for IBND.
BNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNDX and IBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer