BNDX vs. FMDE
BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDX is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. BNDX is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, BNDX returned 1.86% vs 17.86% for FMDE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
BNDX vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 8.21% return.
BNDX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 1.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.37% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 3.99% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDX and FMDE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BNDX and FMDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BNDX vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNDX
FMDE
Real Estate
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
BNDX
FMDE
Financial Services
BNDX
FMDE
Industrials
BNDX
FMDE
Energy
BNDX
FMDE
Communication Services
BNDX
FMDE
Utilities
BNDX
FMDE
Healthcare
BNDX
FMDE
Basic Materials
BNDX
-
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
BNDX
-
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
BNDX
-
FMDE
Technology
BNDX
-
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDX vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
BNDX
FMDE
BNDX vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNDX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.15 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 8.49 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.31 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.28 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
BNDX vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum FMDE drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -21.10% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -8.33% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -2.19% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -2.64% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 2.11% | -1.07% |
Volatility
BNDX vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.47%, while Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 3.52% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 10.03% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 13.75% | -10.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 16.15% | -11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 16.15% | -12.06% |
BNDX vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDX vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than FMDE's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDX and FMDE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDE has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to BNDX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, FMDE leads with 17.86% vs 1.86% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMDE has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.
BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.23% for FMDE.
FMDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNDX and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer