PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDS vs. SMTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDS vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDS achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than SMTH's 0.55% return.


BNDS

1D
0.10%
1M
0.18%
YTD
4.44%
6M
4.74%
1Y
13.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMTH

1D
0.07%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDS vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDS and SMTH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDS vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDS vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDSSMTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.82

1.42

+2.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.66

2.18

+3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.25

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

1.88

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.93

5.71

+12.22

BNDS vs. SMTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDS Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the SMTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDS and SMTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDSSMTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82

1.42

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

1.21

+0.57

Drawdowns

BNDS vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDS drawdown since its inception was -6.96%, which is greater than SMTH's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS and SMTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSSMTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-4.11%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-2.74%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.20%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-1.05%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.91%

-0.16%

Volatility

BNDS vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) is 0.86%, while ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that BNDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDSSMTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.32%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.69%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

3.89%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

4.59%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

4.59%

+0.70%

BNDS vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDS vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison

BNDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than SMTH's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
7.96%7.98%0.00%0.00%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.39%4.46%4.58%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDS and SMTH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTH has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BNDS (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDS dropped -6.96% vs SMTH's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, BNDS leads with 13.48% vs 5.50% for SMTH. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BNDS has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNDS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BNDS.

BNDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.96%, compared with 4.39% for SMTH.

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BNDS and 0.59% for SMTH.

BNDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDS and SMTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer