BNDS vs. QVOL
BNDS (Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF) and QVOL (Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by InfraCap, while QVOL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by InfraCap. Both are actively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BNDS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for QVOL.
Performance
BNDS vs. QVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BNDS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.21%
QVOL
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.24M | $2.01M | $1.56M | |
| $854.22K | $1.19M | $1.49M |
BNDS vs. QVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BNDS Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF | -0.26% |
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDS and QVOL is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDS vs. QVOL — Risk / Return Rank
BNDS
QVOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNDS vs. QVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDS | QVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDS vs. QVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDS drawdown since its inception was -6.96%, smaller than the maximum QVOL drawdown of -13.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS and QVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDS | QVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -13.30% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -7.64% | +6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -4.30% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
BNDS vs. QVOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDS | QVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 30.62% | -27.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 30.62% | -25.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 30.62% | -25.53% |
BNDS vs. QVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than QVOL's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDS vs. QVOL - Dividend Comparison
BNDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than QVOL's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNDS Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF | 8.11% | 7.98% |
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 3.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDS and QVOL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDS is cheaper at 0.81% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDS is cheaper with a 0.81% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for QVOL.
BNDS has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 3.20% for QVOL.
BNDS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while QVOL is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BNDS and 0.82% for QVOL.
Find the right allocation for BNDS and QVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer