PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVOL vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVOL vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QVOL

1D
0.92%
1M
3.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
13.27%
1M
100.26%
YTD
320.44%
6M
237.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVOL vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QVOL and ARMW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVOL vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QVOL vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVOL vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOL drawdown since its inception was -8.29%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOL and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVOLARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-48.47%

+40.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-9.24%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-26.03%

+23.99%

Volatility

QVOL vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVOLARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.06%

92.75%

-62.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.06%

92.75%

-62.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.06%

92.75%

-62.69%

QVOL vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOL has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVOL vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

QVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than ARMW's 19.53% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QVOL and ARMW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QVOL is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QVOL is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 19.53%, compared with 0.98% for QVOL.

They also come from different issuers: Infrastructure Capital Advisors and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for QVOL and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVOL and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer