QVOL vs. ARMW
QVOL (Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVOL charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
QVOL vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QVOL
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 13.27%
- 1M
- 100.26%
- YTD
- 320.44%
- 6M
- 237.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVOL vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 4.14% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 97.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVOL and ARMW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVOL vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVOL vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVOL drawdown since its inception was -8.29%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOL and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVOL | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -48.47% | +40.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -9.24% | +4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -26.03% | +23.99% |
Volatility
QVOL vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVOL | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.06% | 92.75% | -62.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 92.75% | -62.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 92.75% | -62.69% |
QVOL vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVOL has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVOL vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
QVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than ARMW's 19.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 19.53% | 16.38% |
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVOL and ARMW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QVOL is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QVOL is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 19.53%, compared with 0.98% for QVOL.
They also come from different issuers: Infrastructure Capital Advisors and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for QVOL and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for QVOL and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer