PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDS vs. IUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDS vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDS achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than IUSB's 0.54% return.


BNDS

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.70%
YTD
4.80%
6M
4.89%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IUSB

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDS vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDS and IUSB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDS vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSB
IUSB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDS vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDSIUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.24

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.92

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

5.54

+9.95

BNDS vs. IUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDS Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the IUSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDS and IUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDS vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDS drawdown since its inception was -6.96%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS and IUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSIUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-17.90%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-2.53%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.22%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-3.58%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.87%

-0.12%

Volatility

BNDS vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) is 0.74%, while iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that BNDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDSIUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.08%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.73%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

3.59%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.21%

5.80%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

5.05%

+0.16%

BNDS vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDS vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison

BNDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
7.93%7.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
4.23%4.17%4.04%3.46%2.53%1.74%2.68%3.04%2.98%2.56%2.60%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDS and IUSB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to BNDS (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDS dropped -6.96% vs IUSB's -17.90%.

On 1-year performance, BNDS leads with 11.53% vs 4.82% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BNDS has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNDS has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BNDS.

BNDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BNDS and 0.06% for IUSB.

BNDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDS and IUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer