BNDP vs. FIBR
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and FIBR (iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index while FIBR tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FIBR.
Performance
BNDP vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIBR's 0.06% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIBR
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
BNDP vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | 0.06% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and FIBR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
FIBR
BNDP vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDP | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.50 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum FIBR drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and FIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -18.47% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -1.79% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -3.27% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63% | 3.80% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 5.63% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 4.95% | -1.32% |
BNDP vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FIBR's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | 4.62% | 4.78% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.27% | 1.92% | 2.57% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 2.74% | 2.92% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BNDP and FIBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FIBR.
FIBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while FIBR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.25% for FIBR.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and FIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer