PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDP vs. FIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDP vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIBR's 0.06% return.


BNDP

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIBR

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDP vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDP and FIBR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDP vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDP

FIBR
FIBR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDP vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNDP vs. FIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDPFIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.50

-0.25

Drawdowns

BNDP vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum FIBR drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and FIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDPFIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-18.47%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.79%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-3.27%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

Volatility

BNDP vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDPFIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

3.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

5.63%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

4.95%

-1.32%

BNDP vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDP vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison

BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FIBR's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
2.08%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIBR
iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF
4.62%4.78%5.04%4.44%3.27%1.92%2.57%3.27%3.61%2.74%2.92%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BNDP and FIBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FIBR.

FIBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.

BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while FIBR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.25% for FIBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDP and FIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer