BNDP vs. BYLD
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index while BYLD tracks the Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BYLD.
Performance
BNDP vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 0.51% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BYLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.98K | $475.70K | $762.42K | |
| $970.44K | $1.44M | $2.66M |
BNDP vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.46% | 0.08% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 0.51% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and BYLD is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BYLD
BNDP vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum BYLD drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and BYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -14.75% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.37% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -2.49% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 3.81% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 5.21% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 5.42% | -1.77% |
BNDP vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than BYLD's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.47% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 5.42% | 5.32% | 5.31% | 4.45% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.14% | 3.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and BYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for BYLD.
BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 2.47% for BNDP.
BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while BYLD tracks Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.17% for BYLD.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and BYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer