PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDD vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDD vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDD achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than GGOV's 2.61% return.


BNDD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-2.00%
6M
3.46%
YTD
4.08%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
-4.73%
5Y*
10Y*

GGOV

1D
0.24%
1M
0.14%
6M
3.07%
YTD
2.61%
1Y
0.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDD vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDD and GGOV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDD vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GGOV
GGOV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDD vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDDGGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.08

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

0.17

+1.23

BNDD vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDD Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the GGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDD and GGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDD vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDD drawdown since its inception was -30.87%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDD and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDDGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-4.69%

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-4.69%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.67%

-1.20%

-25.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-1.54%

-17.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.12%

+0.57%

Volatility

BNDD vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison

Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.88%. This indicates that BNDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDDGGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

0.88%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

3.62%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

5.28%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

5.19%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.29%

5.19%

+8.10%

BNDD vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDD has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDD vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

BNDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.63%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%
GGOV
iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDD and GGOV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDD has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to GGOV (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDD dropped -30.87% vs GGOV's -4.69%.

On 1-year performance, BNDD leads with 3.75% vs 0.35% for GGOV. On fees, GGOV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNDD has performed better with a 3.75% return vs 0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGOV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

BNDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

BNDD is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for BNDD and 0.39% for GGOV.

BNDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDD and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer