BND vs. SHW
BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BND returned 1.57%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SHW. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BND vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of 1.57%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.83% annualized return.
BND
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
SHW
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- -3.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
BND vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.60% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -0.69% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND and SHW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, BND and SHW have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank
BND
SHW
BND vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BND | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | -0.18 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | -0.37 | +5.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BND vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum SHW drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and SHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -52.02% | +33.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -21.36% | +18.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | -25.69% | +19.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -42.46% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.58% | -42.46% | +23.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -18.78% | +16.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -11.63% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 10.26% | -9.34% |
Volatility
BND vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.28%, while The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 9.00% | -7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 19.26% | -16.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 24.88% | -21.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 26.27% | -20.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 26.60% | -21.07% |
Dividends
BND vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than SHW's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.95% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BND and SHW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs SHW's -52.02%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BND and SHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer