BND.TO vs. VNQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BND.TO (Purpose Global Bond Fund) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BND.TO is a fund fund, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, BND.TO returned 3.00%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for VNQ. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BND.TO is traded in CAD, while VNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND.TO achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BND.TO has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 3.00%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.97% annualized return.

BND.TO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

VNQ

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 11.39%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: 5.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund	0.89%	7.23%	7.49%	8.45%	-7.80%	2.85%	6.14%	4.16%	-0.91%	1.72%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	9.20%	-1.49%	13.82%	9.39%	-21.00%	39.27%	-6.22%	22.57%	1.94%	-1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BND.TO and VNQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2015	0.18

The correlation between BND.TO and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BND.TO	VNQ
Communication Services	100.0%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	97.3%
Technology	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BND.TO vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND.TO

BND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
BND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

VNQ

VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 23
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BND.TO	VNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	0.87	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.24	+1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.16	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	1.59	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	4.12	+4.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND.TO and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BND.TO	VNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	0.87	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.30	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.31	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.67	-0.06

Drawdowns

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND.TO and VNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BND.TO	VNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.55%	-36.98%	+20.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-7.18%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.46%	-16.07%	+11.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.23%	-28.84%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.55%	-36.98%	+20.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-2.30%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-7.35%	+5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	2.77%	-2.08%

Volatility

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) is 1.35%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that BND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BND.TO	VNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	3.80%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	9.57%	-7.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06%	13.14%	-10.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.10%	16.86%	-11.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	19.04%	-13.89%

Dividends

BND.TO vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

BND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than VNQ's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund	5.86%	5.70%	5.24%	5.20%	4.14%	3.89%	3.48%	3.11%	3.96%	3.47%	3.26%	0.53%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	3.69%	3.92%	3.85%	3.95%	3.91%	2.56%	3.93%	3.39%	4.74%	4.23%	4.82%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BND.TO and VNQ in my portfolio?

BND.TO and VNQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.