BMVP vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMVP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg MVP Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BMVP returned 9.43%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMVP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

BMVP vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 9.43%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.

BMVP

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 10.03%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 9.43%

RSP

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	6.62%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	10.53%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and RSP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2003	0.88

The correlation between BMVP and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BMVP vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BMVP	RSP
Industrials	16.8%	14.1%
Financial Services	16.4%	14.5%
Technology	16.4%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.9%
Healthcare	9.7%	11.0%
Communication Services	7.6%	3.7%
Real Estate	5.5%	6.0%
Energy	5.2%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	6.5%
Utilities	5.1%	6.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	4.1%

Return for Risk

BMVP vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 30
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 33

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 55
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMVP	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.80	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.60	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.64	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.78	10.05	-5.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMVP vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMVP	RSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.80	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.53	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.65	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.57	-0.46

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMVP	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-59.92%	-18.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-7.85%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-17.81%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-21.38%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	-39.04%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	0.00%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-6.65%	-29.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.06%	+0.04%

Volatility

BMVP vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 2.26%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMVP	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	2.55%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	8.31%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	11.56%	-1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	16.18%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	18.35%	+0.46%

BMVP vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMVP vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than RSP's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.67%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.48%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMVP and RSP in my portfolio?

BMVP and RSP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMVP or RSP?

RSP has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to BMVP (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, BMVP or RSP?

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 9.43% for BMVP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BMVP or RSP?

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMVP or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMVP or RSP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.48% for RSP.

What is the main difference between BMVP and RSP?

BMVP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.