BMNU vs. USFR
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. BMNU is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
BMNU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -82.74% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 2.01% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -18.33%
- 6M
- -85.30%
- YTD
- -82.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
BMNU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -82.74% | -80.88% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 2.01% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and USFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFR
BMNU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 14.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 200.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 801.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -1.36% | -96.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.89% | 0.00% | -97.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.57% | -0.15% | -81.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.49% | 0.27% | +182.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.49% | 0.39% | +182.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.49% | 0.77% | +181.72% |
BMNU vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.84% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer