BMNU vs. TSMX
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
BMNU vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -73.22% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 92.23% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- 10.82%
- 1M
- -43.61%
- YTD
- -73.22%
- 6M
- -86.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- 24.58%
- YTD
- 92.23%
- 6M
- 104.96%
- 1Y
- 290.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -73.22% | -81.57% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 92.23% | 16.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and TSMX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
TSMX
BMNU vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMNU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 1.63 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than TSMX's maximum drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -63.80% | -33.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.73% | -0.96% | -95.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.79% | -15.81% | -63.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.68% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.61% | 71.64% | +115.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.61% | 80.87% | +106.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.61% | 80.87% | +106.74% |
BMNU vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.30% | 8.01% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and TSMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSMX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSMX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 1.05% for TSMX.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer