BMNU vs. TRSY
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and TRSY (Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while TRSY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. BMNU is actively managed, while TRSY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TRSY.
Performance
BMNU vs. TRSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -82.09% return, which is significantly lower than TRSY's 1.86% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -4.89%
- 1M
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -85.32%
- YTD
- -82.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRSY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. TRSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -82.09% | -80.88% |
TRSY Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF | 1.86% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and TRSY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. TRSY — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRSY
BMNU vs. TRSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | TRSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 58.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 352.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. TRSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than TRSY's maximum drawdown of -0.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and TRSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | TRSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -0.82% | -97.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.81% | 0.00% | -97.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.90% | -0.06% | -81.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. TRSY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | TRSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.66% | 0.39% | +182.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.66% | 1.08% | +181.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.66% | 1.08% | +181.58% |
BMNU vs. TRSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRSY's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. TRSY - Dividend Comparison
BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRSY Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF | 3.65% | 4.00% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and TRSY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRSY is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRSY is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
TRSY has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TRSY is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.06% for TRSY.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and TRSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer