BMNU vs. BEG
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
BMNU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -79.92% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 778.97% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -34.02%
- YTD
- -79.92%
- 6M
- -84.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- 10.53%
- 1M
- 20.45%
- YTD
- 778.97%
- 6M
- 676.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -79.92% | -25.78% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 778.97% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and BEG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.58% | -59.85% | -37.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.55% | 0.00% | -97.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.41% | -16.76% | -63.65% |
Volatility
BMNU vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.51% | 212.53% | -27.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 212.53% | -27.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 212.53% | -27.02% |
BMNU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and BEG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer